The Chelsea manager has established himself in the Premier League and no longer needs to hark back to his success at Porto to defend his reputation

When Liverpool won their Premier League match at Stamford Bridge last month the victorious manager was not just observing protocol when he spoke up for his opposite number. Kenny Dalglish pointed out what André Villas-Boas had lately achieved with Porto while landing the 2011 Europa League and also winning the Portuguese League

• Chelsea manager hits out at media critics
• Villas-Boas brands Neville’s remarks as ‘comic criticism’

André Villas-Boas has launched a scathing attack on Gary Neville, over the pundit’s “ridiculous” criticisms of his Chelsea players. The Portuguese manager also suggested that other former professionals working in the media spoke from a “biased position in their opinion-making”.

Villas-Boas claimed in midweek that Chelsea had been persecuted in the media in recent months, and said that his team’s qualification for the knockout phase of the Champions League would be a “slap in the face” for their critics. He maintained his theme as he prepared for a home match against the Premier League leaders, Manchester City, on Monday.

In an emotional seven-minute critique that was reminiscent of José Mourinho in his Chelsea pomp, Villas-Boas dismissed remarks made by players who have become pundits.

Recent Chelsea performances have been criticised by the likes of Alan Hansen – who said their defending was “catastrophic” – Mark Lawrenson and Graeme Souness, all former Liverpool players. However, Villas-Boas seems to have been angered most by Neville. The former Manchester United and England defender, who now works as an expert analyst for Sky, said David Luiz’s performance against Liverpool was that of a man “being controlled by a 10-year-old on a PlayStation” and suggested in the buildup to the Champions League game against Valencia on Tuesday that he would not have relished being a Chelsea player ahead of that fixture.

“I’m nobody to criticise [Neville's] opinion, but when he takes this ridiculous route I have to defend [my player],” said Villas-Boas. “You cannot be a top English defender like [Neville] was, and a top Manchester United defender like he’s been [and say this] and I’d say this to his face with most pleasure.

“You cannot approach a top Brazil central defender, a player of tremendous aspirations and talent, saying he’s commanded by a kid with a PlayStation. That’s ridiculous. He plays for the team with most titles, so be careful with what you’re saying.

“Nor can you speculate about Chelsea’s dressing room. What does he know about the Chelsea dressing room? … Have you been here? Do you know where Cobham is? You don’t even know how to get here. You cannot speculate or invent based on assumptions or speculation. Some people can have more or less an idea. But not him. He cannot know. I’m normally indifferent, not watching on the telly to see what these people say. But I was watching the television at that moment, and I was gobsmacked.

“When it is comic criticism, and the lack of in-depth criticism from top ex-professional players, I think I have to defend myself and my players. I have to be aggressive. That’s fair. We know most of these people we are speaking about have a direct past related to single clubs, which are their favourite clubs, which in the end brings a likely biased position in their opinion-making.”

The Chelsea manager shrugged off the suggestion that he may be perceived as oversensitive – “You can say what you want,” he said – but was scathing of the Newcastle manager Alan Pardew’s argument that the referee Mike Dean’s unwillingness to dismiss David Luiz for a professional foul on Demba Ba early in last Saturday’s victory at St James’ Park contributed to the injuries subsequently sustained by Danny Guthrie and Steven Taylor. The yellow card shown to David Luiz sees him suspended on Monday.

“Alan Pardew made a big scandal out of this but the guy [Ba] is offside,” Villas-Boas said. “Maybe the linesman should have done his work, and maybe Pardew was lucky. He even got a free-kick which Ryan Taylor could have scored from, Luiz got a yellow card and I got a player suspended. So maybe, now, I should get the card rescinded. And this is the same manager, who got a [dubious] penalty at Old Trafford to get a 1-1, making a big scandal out of this. And then it was ‘it got our players injured, because David Luiz wasn’t sent off’. Come on.”

Chelsea approach the visit of City hoping to close to within seven points of the leaders. Villas-Boas suggested his team’s start to the season – they have taken 28 points from 14 games – had been made to look inadequate by the leaders’ excellence. In support of his argument, he produced a laminated chart that compared his side’s points tally with those achieved in the past few years.

“Chelsea, at the moment, have the same points as the champions last year and the same points as the champions three years ago,” he said. “And they have two points less than the champions four years ago.”

André Villas-BoasChelseaGary NevilleDominic Fifieldguardian.co.uk

André Villas-Boas has been charged with revitalising an anxious side, but this was a flashback to a Chelsea of the recent past

Normal service has been resumed. In the end Chelsea surveyed this group from its pinnacle, pointing to a perfect home record without a goal shipped en route as evidence that this had all been a breeze after all. The tension that had built up over a fortnight, since Bayer Leverkusen dispatched André Villas-Boas’s side in stoppage time at the BayArena, merely melted away, the anxiety that gripped prior to kick-off a deception. There was even a prickly reaction from the manager in his post-match assessment of which José Mourinho would have been proud. This all felt like old times.

This team has been undergoing a metamorphosis since Villas-Boas was appointed in the summer, and that transformation can now be maintained within rather than without the Champions League. Valencia had represented a considerable challenge but while they pinged possession around neatly enough, they were blunted and buried. Villas-Boas has been charged with revitalising his side, and shaping a bright future, but this was a flashback to a Chelsea of the recent past; resilient at the back with Petr Cech outstanding; dynamic through the centre where Ramires was irrepressible; ruthless in attack with Didier Drogba a battering ram to shatter the opposition’s resistance.

There was reassurance to be had in it all. Villas-Boas spoke in the aftermath of tweaking his “strategy”, if not his “philosophy” which continues to revolve around “human values”, by sitting deeper and springing through the Spanish on the break. That is what Chelsea used to do best, all strength and pace, even if the willingness to surrender the ball to their visitors was at odds with the Portuguese’s mantra of being “proactive” and imposing themselves on opponents. One Spanish journalist asked whether that was a “treason” to his underlying beliefs, a question Villas-Boas greeted with incredulity.

Regardless, his ability to remind stalwarts of their qualities when it really mattered was worthy of praise. Drogba was a man possessed, back to the barnstorming best that had propelled this team to the Double under Carlo Ancelotti, with his the performance of a man seeking new terms as his contract runs down towards expiry. Cech, denying David Albelda early on and whatever Valencia flung at him thereafter, had forgotten the uncharacteristically shaky displays in defeat to Arsenal and Liverpool. Chelsea needed his assuredness. They had never previously failed to qualify from the group stage of this competition and the fears that this might be the year they would suffer that ignominy had been very real. The pre-match anxiety had proved as much though, by the end, the locals were chorusing “Carefree” as if mocking their earlier apprehension. This team can move on with confidence pepped.

The repercussions of progress into the knockout stage are more than merely financial. The television monies that will flood, as usual, into the coffers as the Londoners venture further into the latter stages are significant but not critical at a club overseen by a billionaire oligarch. This was about prestige – it would have damaged reputations to have slipped meekly into the Europa League – but, more significantly, it offers the management proper breathing space. Reaching the last 16 despite the stuttering form of late, which had seen three of the previous four home games lost, has contrived to offer Villas-Boas’s regime legitimacy.

His approach had been bold but undeniably risky over recent weeks. Fernando Torres, a British record £50m signing, has been relegated to squad-player status where most assumed the manager’s brief was to encourage the Spaniard to improve. The decision to accept transfer requests from Nicolas Anelka and Alex, ageing but experienced players, ahead of a cluttered December fixture list and then cast them to the fringes at Cobham – they are training at the academy – ahead of anticipated moves next month could be interpreted as the manager delivering a message. The pair’s professionalism may have been publicly praised, but dissenting voices will not be tolerated.

The willingness to gamble was maintained here with Frank Lampard, a player with 20 Champions League goals in 81 appearances and the kind of talisman upon which this club has so often relied, omitted from the start. Had that strategy not come off then the backlash might have been vicious, offering those who doubt the manager’s credentials evidence of his folly. In victory, the selection felt more like a stroke of genius. Ramires’s energy granted Chelsea ferocious bite on the break, with Oriol Romeu so comfortable in possession and Raul Meireles tidy and efficient in a side seeking to sit deep. Lampard, at 33, was still described as “one of the best midfielders in the world” by Villas-Boas, but might have to get used to sitting out future significant games.

There can be no protesting while results are positive, and this was a third 3-0 success in four matches. Villas-Boas had already received the private backing of Roman Abramovich during the recent traumatic spell, but now he can contemplate the work to come from a true position of power. Elimination would have been humiliating. As it is, Manchester City visit here on Monday in a fixture which had appeared daunting at kick-off but, now, feels more like an opportunity to eat into the leaders’ advantage at the top. Crisis allayed.

ChelseaChampions League 2011-12Champions LeagueAndré Villas-Boasguardian.co.uk