José Mourinho still casts a shadow over Stamford Bridge | Kevin McCarra

Five years on from the Special One’s inaugural Chelsea match a string of managers have yet to shake his influence

The idea that José Mourinho could be defective in any respect borders, as he would surely tell you, on the ­blasphemous. Even so, there was a glitch in the Internazionale manager’s recollection of life at the old club he meets in tonight’s Champions League tie. “Chelsea have suffered in the last two years, and it’s no coincidence that their decline happened after I left.” Strictly speaking, that departure occurred because an emotional exhaustion had already set in by September 2007. The club’s owner, Roman Abramovich, needed some respite from the histrionics.

At that moment, any billionaire’s good humour might have been faltering because a home draw with Rosenborg Trondheim had been preceded by a goalless match with Blackburn Rovers and a defeat at Aston Villa. The results were far from ruinous but Mourinho is always capable of getting on a proprietor’s nerves. Just as some players fare better when they come off the bench, there may also be impact managers who thrive in bursts.

It is hard to picture Mourinho staying in one place for decades and ­committing himself to the cycle of building and dismantling teams. There is no reason why he should resemble Sir Alex Ferguson or Arsène Wenger when his explosiveness gives rise to memorable headlines and headaches. Mourinho is invigorating in his own way. The span of three years and three months at Chelsea is easily the longest of his terms at the five clubs he has managed.

He was at his best at the beginning of the Stamford Bridge period. The Premier League title was won in 2005 and a defensive record of a paltry 15 goals conceded was set for the competition. Chelsea’s points tally of 95 also remains the benchmark, even though clubs had four more fixtures in the early years of the Premier League. Frustrations at Manchester City after such great outlay put his work in an even more favourable light.

Mourinho announced himself with a 1-0 win over Manchester United on the opening weekend of the season in August 2004. He did benefit from signings such as Claude Makelele and Frank Lampard made by his predecessor, Claudio ­Ranieri. Well over five years have passed, but half a dozen of the players involved that day are still turning out for Chelsea. Of the starting line-up that beat Wolves at the weekend, only Branislav Ivanovic, Yuri Zhirkov, who misses tonight’s match through injury, and Nicolas Anelka were bought by Mourinho’s successors.

There are honourable reasons for such minor adjustment. It would have been absurd, for example, for Abramovich to go spending at the same excitable rate. Even a billionaire might feel chastened when his determination to splash out £30m on Andriy Shevchenko, who was approaching his 30th birthday in the summer of 2006, led to such ignominy. In terms of strategy, Abramovich is right to feel that his development of the club should ultimately lead to it financing itself. Grown-up considerations of that sort were never strewn in Mourinho’s path.

The beginning was the peak. In that first campaign, he could, in theory, flank Didier Drogba with Damien Duff and Arjen Robben, although the Dutchman had injury problems. It was a debilitating system, with the men on the wings having both to attack and to drop back into midfield. Duff and Robben are in action elsewhere now, but the Stamford Bridge demands did take their toll. The exertion could have been even more worthwhile, but Luis García’s “ghost goal” beat them in the 2005 Champions League semi-final with Liverpool.

Avram Grant had been director of football at Stamford Bridge and was on hand to succeed Mourinho. He would, of course, have delivered the Champions League to Abramovich had John Terry converted his kick in the shoot-out with Manchester United. Over two-thirds of a campaign there was no scope for reconstruction, but the signing of Anelka has been inspired even if it was his saved penalty that made United victors in Moscow.

Then came the much-heralded World Cup winner Luiz Felipe Scolari. He was more radical than the others who followed Mourinho and was sacked in early February 2009. Scolari favoured a type of back three that included a holding ­midfielder such as Mikel John Obi so that the full-backs could be in advanced positions when Chelsea were in possession. It earned compliments, but too few wins. Guus Hiddink was appointed as a caretaker manager and reinstated the old rigour. But for outrageously bad refereeing by Tom Henning Ovrebo the side would surely have knocked out Barcelona in the Champions League semi-final, won on the away goals rule last year.

Carlo Ancelotti, the incumbent, has Chelsea at the top of the Premier League, but the diamond midfield that was ­considered his innovation is no longer so apparent. The shadow of Mourinho still falls over the club and the darkness will deepen if Inter prevail.

Champions LeagueInternazionaleChelseaJosé MourinhoCarlo AncelottiKevin McCarraguardian.co.uk

José Mourinho has a willing foe in the form of Carlo Ancelotti | Richard Williams

The Chelsea managers past and present are poles apart in personality, but only one thinks making enemies is part of the job

Nobody seems certain how soon the ­vendetta between José Mourinho and Carlo Ancelotti began after the arrival of the Portuguese coach in Milan in the ­summer of 2008. But the fires were ­certainly stoked when the Italian TV talkshow host Piero Chiambretti remarked that the difference between Internazionale’s new man and God was that God didn’t believe that he was José Mourinho.

It was Mourinho’s arch response – “Even Jesus isn’t loved by everybody” – that provoked Ancelotti to enter the debate last year. “If Mourinho is Jesus,” he observed, “then I am certainly not one of his apostles.”

No chance of that. When the two men were guiding the historic clubs who share occupancy of the Giuseppe Meazza stadium in the San Siro district of Milan, there was little doubt that they would soon be getting under each other’s skin. And the needling has been revived this week by the meeting of Mourinho’s Inter and Ancelotti’s Chelsea in tonight’s first leg of their Champions League last-16 tie, rendered all the spicier by Mourinho’s frequently expressed belief that the west London team remain very largely the fruit of his work at Stamford Bridge between 2004 and 2007.

In Ancelotti’s autobiography, published during his last year in Milan, Mourinho was lightly ridiculed as “the Great Commander, the King of the Media, the High Lord Specialness”. Mourinho responded by sneering at Italian head coaches who allow the owners of their clubs to pick their teams – an obvious jibe at the relationship between Ancelotti and Silvio Berlusconi, who certainly likes to make his opinions known.

Ancelotti weighed in with a pointed mention of Mourinho’s virtually nonexistent playing career. The Italian did not need to add emphasis by pointing to his own distinguished record with Parma, Roma and Milan, his honours including two league titles and two European Cup winners’ medals. Mourinho shot back by stating that no team of his had ever lost a big match after leading 3-0 at half-time, as Ancelotti’s Milan did in the Champions League final of 2005.

They are from the same generation – Ancelotti is 50, Mourinho 47 – and their clubs are sitting on top of their respective leagues, Chelsea with a four-point lead over Manchester United and Inter with a five-point cushion above Roma, but in almost every other respect they are as far apart as could be.

The phlegmatic Italian frames his thoughts deliberately, disguises his droll sense of humour behind a lugubrious facade and played down the animosity between the two at last night’s pre-match press conference. Nevertheless the Portuguese loves to wield a poison-tipped stiletto and at his own press conference he dealt with Ancelotti’s claim that the whole of Italy, Inter fans apart, will be supporting Chelsea by referring to his rival coach as “one of the clan”, with its mafia overtones.

In Italy, where they are not easily impressed by the handsome overcoats that seduced the English public, the media have less appetite for Mourinho’s ­effrontery and he is regarded – in the words of a correspondent of the Corriere della Sera – as “a stranger, practically an alien, who is finding it very difficult to adapt”. In his season and a half with Inter he has publicly fallen out with the presidents and coaches of several Serie A clubs, and last weekend the list of his enemies grew to include the president of the Italian football federation and the entire body of the country’s match officials.

After Mourinho responded to red cards for his central defenders Walter Samuel and Iván Córdoba in the first half of Sunday’s 0-0 draw with Sampdoria at San Siro by crossing his wrists as though manacled, he received a three-match touchline ban for the implicit suggestion that the officials had denied him and his players a fair chance to compete. Samuel and Córdoba each received a one-game suspension, half of that handed out to Sulley Muntari for aggressive dissent and to Esteban Cambiasso for trying to punch an opponent at half-time. Gabriele Oriali, a World Cup winner with Italy in 1982 and now an Inter director, was also banned for two games for persistently arguing with officials.

Although Massimo Moratti, Inter’s president, dutifully criticised the suspensions as unjustifiably harsh, he is known to harbour a distaste for the consequences of Mourinho’s inflammatory behaviour. But the coach was brought in to replace Roberto Mancini with the aim of capturing the European Cup, which Inter won during the presidency of Angelo Moratti, Massimo’s father, in 1965 and 1966, and success this year might persuade both parties to maintain a somewhat fractious relationship for another season.

Ancelotti has the same target, with an additional requirement to produce the sort of spectacular football with which Chelsea’s owner, Roman Abramovich, wants the club to be identified and which Mourinho, for all his five major trophies, was unable to provide. The Italian has done well in his seven months in charge at Stamford Bridge, despite, as Mourinho pointed out, losing four of his first 27 league matches.

In their winning percentages while in charge of Chelsea, the two managers are virtually neck and neck, with Mourinho at 67% over 185 matches and Ancelotti at 70% over 40 games. With the rival Milan clubs, too, their performance is remarkably similar: 56.7% for Ancelotti over seven seasons with the Rossoneri, 58% for Mourinho over a season and a half with the Nerazzurri. No current manager in top-flight football, of course, can match Mourinho’s ongoing personal record of 130 unbeaten home league matches in succession.

Apart from questions of character, the principal difference between the two may be the contrast between Mourinho’s faith in technical organisation, all ingrained systems and micro-management from the technical area, and Ancelotti’s more relaxed but still rigorous approach. For all the disparity of their methods, however, both command the enduring loyalty and respect of some of the game’s most famous players. But only one of them believes that making enemies is part of the job.

Champions LeagueJosé MourinhoCarlo AncelottiChelseaInternazionaleRichard Williamsguardian.co.uk

Time for the Premier League’s champions-to-be to rise to the occasion | Kevin McCarra

None of the top three has been truly convincing but whoever claims the title should be making a move now

Manchester United interrupted the mediocrity last weekend. It came as a bit of a shock. The dismissal of Arsenal at the Emirates was brisk and few had anticipated that show of strength. Until then there was an assumption that the Premier League had been relegated, with La Liga unquestionably the best domestic competition in the world. Barcelona and Real Madrid may yet prove that to be the case but we have come to the stage of the programme in England where the main rivals will have to reach peak form.

United, as befits a club that has taken the title for the past three years, seem to be finding a rhythm as they pursue the leaders, Chelsea, in earnest. On 19