Chelsea planning season-long loan deal for West Ham’s Scott Parker

• England midfielder could return to Stamford Bridge
• Chelsea looking for cover for injured Michael Essien

Chelsea are understood to be planning a season-long loan move for West Ham’s Scott Parker.

The England midfielder, who left Chelsea for Newcastle in 2005, had been linked with permanent moves to Tottenham and Aston Villa. However, West Ham favour a loan deal, with Parker returning to the club next season should they gain promotion from the Championship.

Chelsea are looking to bolster their midfield after losing Michael Essien to injury until after Christmas.

The West Ham co-owner David Sullivan told Sky Sports News that his club would favour a temporary move.

“We would love a deal where we loan him out for the season for a substantial fee and then when we get promotion he comes back to us. That would appeal to us because we love Scott.

“We would obviously want a loan fee because he has substantial value and has three or four years left of his career. They would probably be getting the best of those three of four years. He is at the absolute peak of his game at the moment and is playing out of his skin.”

ChelseaWest Ham UnitedTransfer windowguardian.co.uk

Liverpool bag Luis Suárez but face fight to keep Fernando Torres

• Chelsea prepare fresh bid of £40m for Spaniard
• Striker tells club the time is right to leave Anfield

Chelsea will return with an improved £40m offer for Fernando Torres with the Premier League champions hopeful of closing the deal before Monday’s transfer deadline after the striker told Liverpool he wants to leave.

Carlo Ancelotti, the Chelsea manager, is prepared to add the young striker Daniel Sturridge as a makeweight in the new bid, which will follow the £35m that was rejected by Liverpool yesterday. Chelsea intend to push hard for what would be a stunning coup and have been encouraged both by Torres’s actions – although he has not yet submitted a formal transfer request – and by Liverpool agreeing a £22.8m deal with Ajax for Luis Suárez this afternoon.

The Suárez fee, which will place him second to Torres as the most expensive signing in Liverpool’s history, represents a £10m increase on the offer that Ajax rejected earlier this week.

Fenway Sports Group, Liverpool’s owners, hope the signing of the Uruguay international, who has still to complete a medical and agree personal terms, will convince Torres of their ambitions and they remain adamant that their leading goalscorer is not for sale. However, the 26-year-old has reached the point where he believes a departure from Anfield is the right move for his career and does not want to miss for the second time the opportunity to join Chelsea. He has urged FSG to broker an agreement that is good for both himself and the club.

Chelsea’s move carries an opportunistic edge. They tried to sign Torres last summer, only for Liverpool to put a prohibitive price tag on him. Chelsea were mindful that Manchester City were also after the Spaniard. Roman Abramovich, the Chelsea owner, was not prepared to enter into an auction. That remains the case.

But with City having signed Edin Dzeko from Wolfsburg for £27m earlier in the month, Chelsea feel they might have a clear shot at Torres now. Hence their determination to get him during this transfer window rather than wait until the summer, when City and others might re-enter the bidding. A footnote to the intrigue is that, if Torres does sign for Chelsea, his debut could be against Liverpool, who play at Stamford Bridge in the Premier League on Sunday week.

“Every time, when there is a possibility to find a better player for this club, we will try,” Ancelotti said. “I don’t need to explain when we move. When we try to do something, we speak together and make the decision. I knew about the bid. I’m not surprised because I know what the club is doing. The club is doing a fantastic job in this transfer market. It is trying to do everything to improve the squad.”

Another factor in Chelsea’s late move for the Spain international is the £50m release clause he was granted by Liverpool last summer. Sources close to Torres have denied such a clause exists and, in this transfer window, that is correct. It is understood the clause comes into effect this summer, providing Liverpool fail to qualify for the Champions League.

Kenny Dalglish’s side are currently nine points adrift of fourth-placed Chelsea, having played one game more, and any suitor would have to pay £50m to release Torres from a £110,000-a-week contract that runs until 2013 should they remain outside the top four.

Torres sought assurances that he could leave in the event of another disappointing season last summer, when he knew Chelsea and City were circling. Those discussions were held with the then managing director, Christian Purslow, who has now left the club, and ultimately led to the striker’s pledging his loyalty to

Five things we learned from Manchester City v Chelsea | Daniel Taylor

From early kick-offs to Chelsea weaknesses, Manchester City’s victory provided some interesting insights

• Chelsea are not invincible

We all know this is a kneejerk sport but there was still something fairly ludicrous about the fact the man with the Sky Sports microphone thought it appropriate to ask Carlo Ancelotti at yesterday’s press conference whether English football was witnessing Chelsea’s version of what Arsenal achieved during the 2003-04 season (thankfully Ancelotti had the good sense to say it would never happen).

True, it had been an immaculate start, with five wins from their opening five games, but Sir Alex Ferguson had a point when he said the champions had benefited from an easy start. With only four fully fit defenders at the club and a 19-year-old centre-half playing at right-back, Manchester City had a vulnerable edge here but Didier Drogba, Nicolas Anelka and Florent Malouda malfunctioned. Things just didn’t click. Their forward play was stodgy, predictable even.

Chelsea are legitimate favourites to retain their title but some perspective is needed – they are not going to leave Manchester United like a speck in the distance. Their defence found Carlos Tevez a constant menace and opposition managers will surely note how Branislav Ivanovic can look vulnerable at right-back, not nimble enough when faced by a player with James Milner’s ability to turn and run.

• Nigel de Jong is more than just a kicker

The problem when you ram your studs into an opponent’s chest in a match watched by three billion people – about half the world’s population – is that people tend to remember it.

It is De Jong’s lot, therefore, that he will probably always be remembered as the guy who committed possibly the worst foul ever to be seen in a World Cup final, and maybe got away with one of the worst miscarriages of justice given that he received only a yellow card.

But don’t make the mistake of thinking he is just a modern-day hatchet man. De Jong is the enforcer in City’s midfield, strong in the tackle, quick to the ball, a man who gives the impression he would run through a plate-glass window for his team. He likes to make his presence felt and, at times, he does trespass into an area of recklessness. But when he gets it right, as he did here, there are few better defensive midfielders in the business.

12.45pm kick-offs are no fun (or not often, anyway)

There are exceptions – Manchester United’s recent visit to Everton being one – but there is a definite pattern of 12.45pm kick-offs drifting into a sense of anti-climax. The crowds tend to be subdued, as if they are nursing a collective hangover. The football can be lethargic, almost dreary at times.

In fairness, it does not help at Eastlands sometimes that City pack their team with so many defence-minded players, but it was strange that such an eagerly anticipated match was so disjointed, even dull, for long spells. This was a big moment in Manchester City’s season but, in the hour preceding Tevez’s goal, it was rare to hear a sell-out crowd so subdued.

There’s more to come from David Silva

It’s lazy in the extreme to say that David Silva is too small to play in the Premier League (this is the man Luis Aragonés, the former Spain manager, once described as having the “biggest balls” in the national team).

Being small, with nimble feet and a low centre of gravity, can actually be an advantage when you play in Silva’s position, with a neat appreciation of space, looking for that killer pass. But there were only sporadic moments when we saw that creativity. That is not to say Silva played badly, just that he was decorating the game rather than dominating it.

He needs more time to adapt to the different challenges of the Premier League but it is encouraging for him that both his manager, Roberto Mancini, and the club’s supporters seem to appreciate this.

Another weakness in Chelsea

The visiting bench consisted of Ross Turnbull, Yuri Zhirkov, Paulo Ferreira, Daniel Sturridge, Patrick van Aanholt, Gaël Kakuta and Josh McEachran – all good players in their own right and, in the case of four of them, outstanding young talents. But this was not a list that smacked of a team with great strength in depth.

City, meanwhile, could call upon Shay Given, Emmanuel Adebayor, Adam Johnson, Jérôme Boateng, Patrick Vieira, Joleon Lescott and Jô. The problem for Ancelotti when his team went a goal behind was that he did not have many ways to change his side for the better.

Manchester CityChelseaDaniel Taylorguardian.co.uk