Chelsea’s failure to nullify Wayne Rooney proved their undoing | David Pleat

It was Wayne Rooney, more than anyone else, who rocked Chelsea, as Manchester United stormed back to snatch a point

After an ordinary first half, the game exploded after the catalyst of Chelsea’s third, fortuitous goal. Juan Mata’s great volley, created by his fellow Spaniard Fernando Torres, had lifted Chelsea’s spirits but their team, devoid of core players – Ashley Cole, Frank Lampard, John Terry and Didier Drogba – fumbled their way forwards after Sir Alex Ferguson’s changes worked to perfection.

His alterations were aided by André Villas-Boas’s decision to substitute Daniel Sturridge, the one player who could create a pressure point for the home team, teasing Patrice Evra to the first goal and then drawing the Manchester United left-back into committing a yellow-card offence. Without his trickery in wide areas, Torres was even more bereft of support. In truth, Torres’s approach play was better than in recent games but in delaying a golden opportunity to score when Chelsea were 3-2 up he displayed a lack of confidence. Chelsea never got into advanced areas down the left because the left-footed Florent Malouda was too narrow, particularly in the first half. Mata, also a left-footer, played his scheming role more centrally, and the right-footed José Bosingwa was trapped when advancing into the middle third.

Torres did not receive one cross from the left to attack from an advanced position and his goal famine goes on.

It was Wayne Rooney, more than anyone else, who rocked Chelsea as United stormed back. Picking up balls from all areas he needed to be man-marked. His energy is incredible and his desire to be accurate in all he does is admirable. His finding of space is so intelligent and his forward runs, with or without the ball, exemplary.

Michael Essien, understandably lacking energy, might have attempted to sit on him had Ramires been available to play alongside Raul Meireles. They needed someone with enough energy and discipline to nail Rooney.

Paul Scholes, in the centre, was clinical and Ryan Giggs, calm and classy on the left, held sway. The Blues lacked the confidence to keep the ball and gain passages of possession to take the sting out of the game. They got submerged into the ebb and flow, but they desperately needed to hold the game as United threw caution to the wind. Ferguson had a field day. Even David de

Uefa intends to sanction clubs who continue to report huge losses

• Governing body will defend in court any penalties challenged
• Clubs could be excluded from Champions League

Uefa has said it will defend in court any penalties imposed on clubs which breach its financial fair play rules, including most seriously the possibility of clubs being excluded from the Champions League.

After European football’s governing body released a report showing clubs across Europe’s top divisions lost a total of €1.6bn (£1.34bn) in 2009-10, Alasdair Bell, its director of legal affairs, was emphatic that the rules, which require loss-making clubs to move towards breaking even, comply with European law and will be upheld if challenged by clubs.

Uefa’s belief is that because the rules are designed to have the positive objective principally of “protecting the long-term viability and sustainability of European club football”, a court would uphold that as reasonable. In answer to what has become the Manchester City and Chelsea question, the clubs which lost £197m and £78m respectively according to their most recent accounts, Bell said Uefa will have to impose proportionate sanctions, which would have to be substantial where clubs are in serious breach of the rules. “The system is not going to have much credibility if a big club that is in serious breach of the rules is not punished in an effective way,” Bell said. “The sanctions need to be effective enough that clubs come into compliance with the system.”

Bell set out for the first time publicly the legal groundwork supporting Uefa’s financial fair play rules, which limit the losses clubs can make to a total of €45m (£37.6m) if covered by an owner, in this financial year and 2012-13. The principles, that clubs must limit their losses, in effect by restraining spending on players’ wages, while being encouraged to invest in stadiums, academies and other long-term infrastructure, are designed to improve football’s overall financial stability and comply with European legal principles.

Uefa set out the range of sanctions which will be available to a semi-independent panel depending on how seriously a club is in breach: they range from a reprimand, to a fine, withholding by Uefa of money, deducting points, preventing clubs fielding certain players in European competitions and ultimately to a ban.

The €1.6bn loss was principally due to inflating wages and transfer fees – the clubs’ income actually increased, from €12bn in 2008-09 to €12.8bn. Gianni Infantino, Uefa’s general secretary, explained: “We have to stop this negative spiral of clubs making losses and having huge debts. If we did not act, we could have a similar crisis to the one in the European economy as a whole.”

UefaManchester CityChelseaDavid Conn
guardian.co.uk

Gary Cahill could be a Chelsea player by Sunday, says Owen Coyle

• Coyle denies formal interest from Manchester United
• Cahill to sit out FA Cup tie with Macclesfield Town

Gary Cahill could be a Chelsea player by Sunday, according to the Bolton Wanderers manager, Owen Coyle, with Chelsea confirming that talks are ongoing regarding the defender’s personal terms.

A fee has been agreed and Cahill will not play in Bolton’s FA Cup tie at Macclesfield Town, though Coyle denied this is because of the defender’s imminent move. Coyle said: “It’s nothing to do with the continuing speculation regarding Chelsea. He’s one of a number of players that probably needs to rest.

“And moving on, my opinion is I think there’s a chance the deal can be concluded by the end of the week. That’s where we’re at, but I’m not a party to any continued dialogue between Chelsea and Gary’s representative.”

Coyle denied there had been bids for Cahill from any other clubs, despite reported interest from Tottenham Hotspur and Manchester United. “When there’s continued conjecture and everything that goes with it people are always going to throw up names,” he said.

“There hasn’t been any dialogue between ourselves and Manchester United or anything like that. We as a football club agreed a deal with Chelsea Football Club and for me that’s binding.”

Roberto Di Matteo, the Chelsea assistant manager, said: “A fee has been agreed and there are ongoing negotiations for personal terms. He would add very good qualities to our squad.” But Di Matteo claimed this would not be a busy transfer window for Chelsea. He said: “I wouldn’t expect too much to happen in this market. We are happy with the quality we have.”

Asked if he was confident that Didier Drogba, who has been linked with a move to China, would still be a Chelsea player at the close of the window Di Matteo said: “Very confident.”

He was equally unequivocal regarding Frank Lampard, whom Sir Alex Ferguson on Friday denied would be joining Manchester United this month. “I can’t see him leaving this club,” Di Matteo said. “He has been here for 10 years and he’s part of the successful history of this club.”

Di Matteo offered a spiky response to Ferguson ruling Chelsea, who are 11 points behind leaders Manchester City, out of the title race. “Well what did he say about his own team?” he said. “I respect what Sir Alex says but mathematically we can still win it and that is our view and we will fight.”

For Sunday’s FA Cup tie against Portsmouth at Stamford Bridge John Terry will undergo a fitness test on a knee on Saturday but Drogba and Salomon Kalou will be unavailable. The forwards fly to the Africa Cup of Nations on Saturday to play for Ivory Coast after Chelsea failed in a request for them to feature against Portsmouth.

Transfer windowChelseaOwen CoyleBolton WanderersJamie Jacksonguardian.co.uk