<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Watch Chelsea &#187; manchester city</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.watchchelsea.com/tag/manchester-city/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.watchchelsea.com</link>
	<description>Part of the Watch Live Breathe Network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 16:53:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>Uefa intends to sanction clubs who continue to report huge losses</title>
		<link>http://www.watchchelsea.com/2012/01/25/uefa-intends-to-sanction-clubs-who-continue-to-report-huge-losses/</link>
		<comments>http://www.watchchelsea.com/2012/01/25/uefa-intends-to-sanction-clubs-who-continue-to-report-huge-losses/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 20:10:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Latest Chelsea News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chelsea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clubs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[manchester]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[manchester city]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rules]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.watchchelsea.com/2012/01/25/uefa-intends-to-sanction-clubs-who-continue-to-report-huge-losses/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ • Governing body will defend in court any penalties challenged • Clubs could be excluded from Champions League Uefa has said it will defend in court any penalties imposed on clubs which breach its financial fair play rules, including most seriously the possibility of clubs being excluded from the Champions League. After European football's governing body released a report showing clubs across Europe's top divisions lost a total of €1.6bn (£1.34bn) in 2009-10, Alasdair Bell, its director of legal affairs, was emphatic that the rules, which require loss-making clubs to move towards breaking even, comply with European law and will be upheld if challenged by clubs. Uefa's belief is that because the rules are designed to have the positive objective principally of "protecting the long-term viability and sustainability of European club football", a court would uphold that as reasonable]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>
<p>• Governing body will defend in court any penalties challenged<br />• Clubs could be excluded from Champions League</p>
<p>Uefa has said it will defend in court any penalties imposed on clubs which breach its financial fair play rules, including most seriously the possibility of clubs being excluded from the Champions League.</p>
<p>After European football&#8217;s governing body released a report showing clubs across Europe&#8217;s top divisions lost a total of €1.6bn (£1.34bn) in 2009-10, Alasdair Bell, its director of legal affairs, was emphatic that the rules, which require loss-making clubs to move towards breaking even, comply with European law and will be upheld if challenged by clubs.</p>
<p>Uefa&#8217;s belief is that because the rules are designed to have the positive objective principally of &#8220;protecting the long-term viability and sustainability of European club football&#8221;, a court would uphold that as reasonable. In answer to what has become the Manchester City and Chelsea question, the clubs which lost £197m and £78m respectively according to their most recent accounts, Bell said Uefa will have to impose proportionate sanctions, which would have to be substantial where clubs are in serious breach of the rules. &#8220;The system is not going to have much credibility if a big club that is in serious breach of the rules is not punished in an effective way,&#8221; Bell said. &#8220;The sanctions need to be effective enough that clubs come into compliance with the system.&#8221;</p>
<p>Bell set out for the first time publicly the legal groundwork supporting Uefa&#8217;s financial fair play rules, which limit the losses clubs can make to a total of €45m (£37.6m) if covered by an owner, in this financial year and 2012-13. The principles, that clubs must limit their losses, in effect by restraining spending on players&#8217; wages, while being encouraged to invest in stadiums, academies and other long-term infrastructure, are designed to improve football&#8217;s overall financial stability and comply with European legal principles.</p>
<p>Uefa set out the range of sanctions which will be available to a semi-independent panel depending on how seriously a club is in breach: they range from a reprimand, to a fine, withholding by Uefa of money, deducting points, preventing clubs fielding certain players in European competitions and ultimately to a ban.</p>
<p>The €1.6bn loss was principally due to inflating wages and transfer fees – the clubs&#8217; income actually increased, from €12bn in 2008-09 to €12.8bn. Gianni Infantino, Uefa&#8217;s general secretary, explained: &#8220;We have to stop this negative spiral of clubs making losses and having huge debts. If we did not act, we could have a similar crisis to the one in the European economy as a whole.&#8221;</p>
<p>UefaManchester CityChelseaDavid Conn<br/>guardian.co.uk </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.watchchelsea.com/2012/01/25/uefa-intends-to-sanction-clubs-who-continue-to-report-huge-losses/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Premier League half-term fans&#8217; reports: Arsenal to Manchester United</title>
		<link>http://www.watchchelsea.com/2011/12/17/premier-league-half-term-fans-reports-arsenal-to-manchester-united/</link>
		<comments>http://www.watchchelsea.com/2011/12/17/premier-league-half-term-fans-reports-arsenal-to-manchester-united/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Dec 2011 00:00:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Latest Chelsea News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blackburn rovers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[features]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liverpool]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[manchester city]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the observer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.watchchelsea.com/2011/12/17/premier-league-half-term-fans-reports-arsenal-to-manchester-united/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Part one of the Observer fans' network's review of the 2011-12 season so far ARSENAL: 6/10 Bernard Azulay, GoonersDiary.blogspot.com It feels as if the mettle we've displayed in our recent run of form was forged in the debacle of the opening weeks of our campaign, when we struggled to cope with the departures of Fábregas and Nasri, together with the absence of Vermaelen and Wilshere. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>
<p>Part one of the Observer fans&#8217; network&#8217;s review of the 2011-12 season so far</p>
<p>ARSENAL: 6/10
<p><strong>Bernard Azulay, </strong><strong>GoonersDiary.blogspot.com</strong> It feels as if the mettle we&#8217;ve displayed in our recent run of form was forged in the debacle of the opening weeks of our campaign, when we struggled to cope with the departures of Fábregas and Nasri, together with the absence of Vermaelen and Wilshere. We may remain only one hamstring away from disaster in respect of Van Persie but, no matter where we end up, most Gooners see plenty of reason for optimism in the burgeoning spirit within this squad – something that had been missing for far too long.</p>
<p><strong>Star man </strong>Obviously Van Persie, but with plenty of kudos to the unstinting commitment of others such as Koscielny.</p>
<p><strong>The flops</strong> Chamakh, a mysteriously pale shadow of the striker who first arrived at the club, and Arshavin, who appears as if he can&#8217;t wait to escape.</p>
<p><strong>The gaffer:</strong> <strong>Arsène Wenger, 7/10 </strong>While Wenger&#8217;s desire to cling on to our star players was perfectly understandable, the fact that he was forced into the equivalent of Supermarket Sweep in the final few hours of the transfer window felt like a failure on his part. Nevertheless, all credit must go to Le Gaffer for silencing  the critics who were far too quick to sound our death knell.</p>
<p><strong>Who should he sign?</strong> Although our recent injury crisis at full-back has exposed a disconcerting lack of depth in the squad, we are desperate for some replacement firepower up front. Albeit somewhat erratic, Podolski is not cup-tied in Europe and may be best suited to adapt to the Premier League.</p>
</p>
<p>ASTON VILLA: 4/10
<p><strong>Jonathan Pritchard, Observer reader</strong> It has all been so grimly predictable: beating the rubbish, losing to the quality, the massive anti-McLeish tidal wave when we play badly … You could read our season like a book. And not a very good book. We are all craving something sublime or ridiculous to lift the general malaise: football surely isn&#8217;t supposed to be this humdrum? It feels like death by a thousand Blackburns right now.</p>
<p><strong>Star man </strong>Gabby Agbonlahor has been easily our best player: we&#8217;ve scored 18, he&#8217;s scored five and assisted eight, and the buzz around the ground when he gets the ball has returned.</p>
<p><strong>The flops</strong> Controversially, I&#8217;d aim the most criticism at Bent and his inability to do anything but goal-hang. Five tap-ins and absolutely nothing else is what he&#8217;s contributed in 14 games. I&#8217;d sell him.</p>
<p><strong>The gaffer:</strong> <strong>Alex McLeish, 4//10 </strong>I don&#8217;t blame him as much as most. He&#8217;d been stripped of his two most creative players before he arrived and the gamble on N&#8217;Zogbia has failed. We play dour football, but doesn&#8217;t everyone apart from the billionaires? I&#8217;m not sure anyone could make a silk purse out of this sow&#8217;s ear of a squad. Villa fans need to stop being so parochial with the &#8220;Bluenose&#8221; stuff: he&#8217;s our manager, so we may as well get behind him.</p>
<p><strong>Who should he sign? </strong>Bobby Zamora.</p>
</p>
<p>BLACKBURN: 0/10
<p><strong>Marcus Tattersall, </strong><strong>Blogs.soccernet.com/blackburnrovers</strong><strong> </strong>A farcical, tragi-comedy that should have the theme tune of The Benny Hill Show playing in the background. Nothing surprises any more about a club that have undergone a character assassination, from being a model of calm respectability under the guidance of John Williams to a dysfunctional shambles that epitomises Venky&#8217;s. Contrary to popular belief, the supporters have been magnificent but the daily rumour mill has taken its toll and the majority have never felt as disillusioned and distanced from the club. The authorities have driven a divide between supporters through mixed messages and spin, and the club are in danger of imploding and losing a generation of fans.</p>
<p><strong>Star man </strong>Samba is still dancing and the Yak has had a good appetite.</p>
<p><strong>The flops</strong> Radosav Petrovic resembles a deer in headlights every time he plays.</p>
<p><strong>The gaffer:</strong> <strong>Steve Kean 1/10 </strong>The greatest spin doctor since Alastair Campbell. If Kean were captain of the Titanic he would tell the passengers it had hit ice to help keep the drinks chilled. The only positive is we score more goals but if we can&#8217;t keep the ball it counts for nothing.</p>
<p><strong>Who should he sign? </strong>An experienced chairman or chief executive who could command the respect and trust of the fans is priority.</p>
</p>
<p>BOLTON: 3/10
<p><strong>Shaun O&#8217;Gara, Supporters&#8217; Club </strong>The season started well with a 4-0 win at QPR but it has been downhill ever since in a disastrous run. Rock bottom of the league, nine points from 15 games – in fact since our semi-final defeat to Stoke last April we have played 21 Premier League games with only four wins and 17 defeats. A dramatic improvement is needed or we&#8217;ll be relegated by New Year.</p>
<p><strong>Star man </strong>There&#8217;s been so many inconsistent performances and so many players who are not performing, but Klasnic&#8217;s seven goals are one plus.</p>
<p><strong>The flops</strong> Reo Coker and Pratley in midfield have both disappointed. Eagles has been inconsistent. Ngog is still finding his feet, only one goal so far, and Boyata in defence looks like he&#8217;d rather be somewhere else – probably back at City.</p>
<p><strong>The gaffer:</strong> <strong>Owen Coyle 4/10 </strong>This time last season he&#8217;d just won the manager of the month award and we were playing free-flowing, attractive football. Now we&#8217;re unable to string two passes together, have forgotten how to defend and confidence is at an all-time low. Owen&#8217;s managerial reputation has taken a battering. The slump in form since the FA Cup defeat to Stoke is alarming – it&#8217;s as if the players&#8217; belief in the manager and what he is trying to do evaporated in that moment as up to then things were on an upward spiral we were in the top 10 most of last season and in the FA Cup semi final for only the second time in 50 years. Owen Coyle is certainly enduring his most difficult time in management – he&#8217;s had terrible bad luck in that injuries have robbed him of key players – Stuart Holden, last season&#8217;s player of the year and the heartbeat of the side being the biggest blow. All our problems seemed to start with his injury last March, both him and Chung Yong Lee, the previous year&#8217;s winner, are both out for most of the season. In fact, 11 players are currently on the injured list, four with broken legs! We lost 20 goals in Elmander and Sturridge which we haven&#8217;t replaced. He&#8217;s been hampered by a  lack of money to spend. The replacements look short on quality at Premier League level..</p>
<p><strong>Who should he sign? </strong>We desperately need some steel and creativity in midfield. Presuming Gary Cahill is sold then a centre-half, as well as two full‑backs and a striker. In fact, we need to strengthen everywhere.</p>
</p>
<p> CHELSEA: 7/10
<p><strong>Trizia Fiorellino, </strong><strong>ChelseaSupportersGroup.net </strong> We started well, flopped badly and have picked up dramatically. Given we have some new players and a new manager trying to impose a new style on the old guard, I am more than happy with our current lofty position. Annoyed to have lost to some average sides but there will always be those that capitalise when another team are undergoing a significant change – they were lucky to play us at a vulnerable time.</p>
<p><strong>Star man </strong>Romeu has been a revelation and has made us a more difficult team to break down, but Mata has shone. He instantly makes us look more inventive. Leaving confused opposition players in his wake, he provides excellent service to our strikers. Whisper this – he may be better than Zola.</p>
<p><strong>The flops</strong> Malouda – we all know what he&#8217;s capable of, but all we invariably get now is him losing the ball, bottling tackles and putting in poor crosses.</p>
<p><strong>The gaffer:</strong> <strong>André Villas-Boas 7/10 </strong>I like the way he conducts himself, especially the digs at Gary Neville and the media – we need a manager who sticks up for us. We are finally beginning to see the emergence of his first team and it doesn&#8217;t look bad at all. He is not afraid to make controversial decisions and give him a couple more of his own signings and I think we could be on to something.</p>
<p><strong>Who should he sign? </strong>With the exits of Anelka and Alex, and the Africa Cup of Nations to consider, we really could do with a striker and a central defender – but January is not the best time to do it, especially as our contract negotiations seem to go on for ever.</p>
</p>
<p>EVERTON: 6/10
<p><strong>Steve Jones, </strong><strong>BlueKipper.com</strong> The season has been very frustrating for Evertonians so far. With Beckford and Yakubu leaving for financial reasons, and Arteta to play in the Champions league, it left us with very few attacking options. We&#8217;ve suffered because they haven&#8217;t been replaced. David Moyes has had to use young players like Rodwell, Vellios, Barkley and McAleny, who have all had some great moments but have also shown us that they need to learn a bit more before they can be given a run in the team.</p>
<p><strong>Star man </strong>Leighton Baines. He has shown yet again why he is the best attacking full‑back in the Premier League.</p>
<p><strong>The flops</strong> A lot was expected from Louis Saha, but two goals so far is a poor return.</p>
<p><strong>The gaffer:</strong> <strong>David Moyes 6/10 </strong>I think Moyesy is great for Everton, but he has slipped below his high standards this season so far.</p>
<p><strong>Who should he sign? </strong>We desperately need an experienced striker for a couple of million. Unfortunately, I don&#8217;t know one.</p>
</p>
<p>FULHAM: 6/10
<p><strong>David Lloyd, </strong><strong>TOOFIF.co.uk</strong> Largely frustrating so far. We&#8217;ve got a better squad than last year, have greater strength in depth and yet have struggled to find any consistency as lineups and tactics have been chopped and changed. Backstage bickering hasn&#8217;t helped the cause, neither has an over-cautious, at times negative approach. In among it all there&#8217;s a good team trying to get out, but the key question is can Martin Jol settle on his best lineup and tactics?</p>
<p><strong>Star man </strong>Ruiz and Dembélé are getting better by the week, while Murphy remains hugely effective, but it&#8217;s hard to look beyond Hangeland.</p>
<p><strong>The flops</strong> Zamora has blown hot and cold while John Arne Riise has improved recently after a run of stodgy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.watchchelsea.com/2011/12/17/premier-league-half-term-fans-reports-arsenal-to-manchester-united/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chelsea v Manchester City: in pictures</title>
		<link>http://www.watchchelsea.com/2011/12/12/chelsea-v-manchester-city-in-pictures/</link>
		<comments>http://www.watchchelsea.com/2011/12/12/chelsea-v-manchester-city-in-pictures/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 23:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Latest Chelsea News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[editorial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[manchester city]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[premier]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[premier-league]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.watchchelsea.com/2011/12/12/chelsea-v-manchester-city-in-pictures/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Tom Jenkins watched Chelsea break City's unbeaten Premier League run on a rainy night at Stamford Bridge, with Lampard finishing off the proceedings to make it 2-1 Tom Jenkins ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>
<p>Tom Jenkins watched Chelsea break City&#8217;s unbeaten Premier League run on a rainy night at Stamford Bridge, with Lampard finishing off the proceedings to make it 2-1</p>
<p>Tom Jenkins
<p style="clear:both" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.watchchelsea.com/2011/12/12/chelsea-v-manchester-city-in-pictures/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

