David Bernstein’s calmness helps FA make right decision on captaincy

Chairman emerges with credit after bypassing Fabio Capello and grasping the nettle of John Terry’s court case

This is unusual territory for the Football Association in more ways than one. The governing body finds itself in the unfamiliar position of being widely, if quietly, praised for its handling of a toxic and difficult situation – outside Cobham and Stamford Bridge, at least.

Not for the first time the FA chairman, David Bernstein, has emerged with credit for calm, decisive action amid evidence of greater steel atop an organisation too often buffeted by events. The sports minister, Hugh Robertson, said: “This is not necessarily a popular thing to say, but I’m impressed with David Bernstein. He’s a very calm hand on the tiller. He seems to get the balance right. He calmly rang round the board, made a decision and pressed ahead with it. He did it in the right way.”

There was a sense of deja vu this week, as pressure built on the FA to act. They had been here before in Feburary 2010, when Terry was accused of an alleged affair with a former team-mate’s ex-partner. But it is a measure of the speed of turnover at the top of the organisation over the past decade that the inhabitants of both the chairman and chief executive chairs have changed since then.

Then, the chief executive Ian Watmore chose to handle the situation by attempting to clear enough air space to allow the decision to be made by Fabio Capello, though the Italian seemed to show little appetite for it, insisting the captaincy was a matter for the coach.

The issues were different this time. But Bernstein resolved to take the matter out of Capello’s hands reasoning, say insiders, that the issue was not simply a football matter but a broader one.

Bernstein’s statement, delivered direct to camera in Pravda-esque fashion from a Wembley box, made this explicit: “Fabio Capello has not been involved in the FA board discussions which reached this conclusion, but understands that the FA board has authority to make this decision.”

Bernstein’s move to bring the Club England wing of the organisation back under the jurisdiction of the FA chairman is also significant, allowing for swifter decision-making.

It has hard to imagine the famously low-key Geoff Thompson, Bernstein’s predecessor but one, putting his head above the parapet in such a way. And such was the level of vicious infighting during the David Triesman era, it is equally difficult to see him building a consensus for swift action in the way that Bernstein did.

Bernstein is quiet too. But quietly effective. Once Terry’s case was adjourned to July he consulted his 13 fellow board members, a number swelled since the addition of non-executive directors Heather Rabbatts and Roger Devlin last month, by phone on Thursday. The majority shared his view and Bernstein called the Chelsea player himself on Friday morning to inform him of the decision.

Rather than worrying about precedent or previous cases, he judged the situation on the facts before him and shifted course when circumstances changed. There is a valid debate about whether the FA should have acted earlier, especially once Terry was charged in December, but Bernstein can point to the widespread belief that the case was to be settled before the European Championship.

There is talk of a more businesslike approach in the Wembley boardroom since Bernstein arrived in January last year. Premier League insiders make increasingly positive noises about relations with their counterparts at Wembley, while good relations with Uefa have been fostered.

The former Manchester City and Wembley chairman has been criticised for his lack of dynamism in public. But following a period during which the FA churned through six chief executives and three chairmen in a decade, who all jumped or pushed for a variety of reasons, his calmly resolute stance might be just what it needs. He will need every ounce of it for battles to come. The FA is going into a major tournament with a coach who will leave at its end, no discernible succession plan in place and a now former captain facing a racism charge weeks after it concludes. Meanwhile, football’s response to government calls for change in the way the game is governed is due by the end of the month, with the composition of the FA board a sticking point. And for any stability to endure, the FA’s statutes will have to be changed if the 68-year-old Bernstein is to carry on beyond his 70th birthday in May 2013.

There will be no immediate respite either. Already, many are questioning whether it is a sustainable position to strip Terry of the captaincy but not suspend him altogether. Atop the dysfunctional FA, balancing inertia and knee-jerk reaction while being buffeted by the demands of the media and avoiding being undone from within by politicking or from without by the demands of the professional game has often seemed an impossible job. Bernstein seems to have got the balance about right. For now, at least.

John TerryThe FAEnglandChelseaFootball politicsOwen Gibson
guardian.co.uk

John Terry trial date will disrupt QPR’s build-up, says Mark Hughes

• July trial to affect Anton Ferdinand’s pre-season training
• ‘No one discussed the date with me,’ claims angry Hughes

The timing of John Terry’s trial will disrupt pre-season for Anton Ferdinand and Queens Park Rangers, according to Mark Hughes.

The Chelsea captain, who denies allegations he made a racist comment to Ferdinand when the sides met in October, could face a five-day trial starting on 9 July. “Anton is obviously involved in the case and they have been given a date that is slap-bang in the middle of our pre-season from my point of view and Anton’s point of view. That is going to impact on his preparation for a new season,” the QPR manager said.

“I don’t know how they have come up with the date, whether they have had discussions with the FA and [made sure] it doesn’t impact on the Euros. They haven’t discussed it with us. They have certainly not discussed the date with me. It seems to be set in stone and it’s slap-bang in the middle of our pre-season operation when ideally I would want my player available.

“If John goes to the Euros it impacts on his holiday; it doesn’t impact on his pre-season because he’ll get a rest after the Euros. It’s just in his down-time, it’s not in Anton’s down-time. My understanding is that we were not involved in the discussion about a date. I might be completely wrong but certainly I wasn’t in that discussion if there was one.

“We’d like to have had a chance to put our point across to make them understand that there could be a little bit of an issue from our point of view.”

It is understood that the Football Association was not consulted regarding the trial’s date. The decision was taken by judge Howard Riddle at Westminster magistrates court on Wednesday, with a letter from Ron Gourlay, the Chelsea chief executive, part of the process.

Hughes is frustrated that the case cannot be heard earlier. “I think everybody believes it has been dragging on forever,” he said. “From my point of view, and certainly Anton I would have thought, [we] would have preferred it to be done and dusted by now. I think everybody would.”

Asked if he thought the date of the trial will also affect Fabio Capello’s England side at the European Championship, Hughes said: “Well that’s a decision for England. I’m sure discussions will be held in that regard on whether it will have a negative impact in terms of selection but it’s not for me to comment.”

QPR host Wolverhampton Wanderers on Saturday having picked up four points from their past two league outings to take them to 16th in the Premier League and Hughes said: “The target is to stay up. I think it’s important we take something from every game. We’ve beaten Wigan and got a good point at [Aston] Villa. If we can get maximum points at the weekend, it’s seven from three and that’s a decent return. That’s what we need to do, keep picking up points.”

Hughes, who is likely to pair his new signings Bobby Zamora and Djibril Cissé for the first time against Wolves, stated he was content with the draw at Villa despite squandering a two-goal lead. “There was disappointment in the dressing room because we were leading 2-0 but it’s a good sign that you are disappointed about getting a point at Villa Park. Beforehand we would have been delighted with a point.”

QPRJohn TerryMark HughesChelseaJamie Jackson
guardian.co.uk

Trial delay leaves John Terry free to captain England at Euro 2012

• Terry pleads not guilty as judge sets trial date of 9 July
• Defender denies racially abusing Anton Ferdinand

John Terry will be free to captain England at the summer’s European Championship after his criminal trial over allegations he racially abused the Queens Park Rangers defender Anton Ferdinand during a Premier League match was set for 9 July.

The Chelsea defender, who did not attend Wednesday’s first hearing into the case at Westminster magistrates’ court, is accused of a racially aggravated public order offence made in an altercation with Ferdinand during his side’s 1-0 defeat at Loftus Road on 23 October. A not guilty plea was entered by his legal counsel, George Carter-Stephenson QC, in the 31-year-old’s absence before the district judge Howard Riddle.

The prosecution had initially hoped the case would be heard in mid-March, but the trial has instead been held over until the summer after the judge considered Terry’s playing commitments for club and country over the course of the next four months. The district judge also took into account a letter submitted to the court by the Chelsea chief executive, Ron Gourlay, in which he had appealed for the trial to be delayed given the defence counsel intend to call a number of Chelsea players and staff as character witnesses.

The club were concerned that their preparations for matches might be disrupted by the case. Chelsea could potentially be involved in the Champions League final on 19 May, with England then due to play two friendly fixtures – against Norway and Belgium on 26 May and 2 June – before departing for Euro 2012 in Poland and Ukraine, a tournament which does not end until 1 July.

The court also took into account Ferdinand’s commitments to QPR over the remainder of the current Premier League campaign, which does not end until 13 May, as well as a holiday he had booked for June and his club’s pre-season tour of Asia, which is scheduled for 16-27 July. Judge Riddle even acknowledged the possibility that the players might then be involved in the Great Britain Olympic men’s football squad in setting the date for trial, with five days initially put aside for the process.

The England manager, Fabio Capello, has stressed that Terry will be considered innocent unless proven guilty and will therefore retain the captaincy of the national side, but has not spoken on the subject since formal charges against Terry were announced. The Football Association’s own independent inquiry into the incident at Loftus Road is currently suspended pending the result of the criminal proceedings. However, the fact that the trial will now take place after Euro 2012 does place Rio Ferdinand, Anton’s older brother and the current England vice-captain, in a potentially awkward position given that he could be selected for the national squad to play alongside Terry with the issue still unresolved.

The Manchester United defender has not commented on the case publicly and missed England’s friendlies against Spain and Sweden in November through injury, but will confront Terry directly at Stamford Bridge on Sunday when the champions play Chelsea in the Premier League. At present, it is anticipated that he will agree to shake Terry’s hand in the pre-match formalities.

If found guilty, Terry could be fined up to £2,500 though the implications for his captaincy of both the England and Chelsea teams, as well as his numerous personal sponsorship deals, would be more serious. “Now that the court has fixed a date for trial, Mr Terry looks forward to the opportunity to clear his name,” read a statement released by his legal team, Grosvenor Law. “Mr Terry has consistently and resolutely maintained that his well-publicised remarks were made in the belief that he was being accused of racist abuse by Mr Ferdinand.

“Mr Terry was shocked and disgusted by that accusation at the time. Mr Terry denies making any racist statement, and will establish in court that he is not guilty of such offence. Mr Terry has never racially abused another player in his entire career.” The Chelsea manager, André Villas-Boas, suggested on Saturday that he would consider giving Terry some time off if necessary over the months ahead in order to clear his name.

John TerryChelseaQPRDominic Fifield
guardian.co.uk