David Bernstein’s calmness helps FA make right decision on captaincy

Chairman emerges with credit after bypassing Fabio Capello and grasping the nettle of John Terry’s court case

This is unusual territory for the Football Association in more ways than one. The governing body finds itself in the unfamiliar position of being widely, if quietly, praised for its handling of a toxic and difficult situation – outside Cobham and Stamford Bridge, at least.

Not for the first time the FA chairman, David Bernstein, has emerged with credit for calm, decisive action amid evidence of greater steel atop an organisation too often buffeted by events. The sports minister, Hugh Robertson, said: “This is not necessarily a popular thing to say, but I’m impressed with David Bernstein. He’s a very calm hand on the tiller. He seems to get the balance right. He calmly rang round the board, made a decision and pressed ahead with it. He did it in the right way.”

There was a sense of deja vu this week, as pressure built on the FA to act. They had been here before in Feburary 2010, when Terry was accused of an alleged affair with a former team-mate’s ex-partner. But it is a measure of the speed of turnover at the top of the organisation over the past decade that the inhabitants of both the chairman and chief executive chairs have changed since then.

Then, the chief executive Ian Watmore chose to handle the situation by attempting to clear enough air space to allow the decision to be made by Fabio Capello, though the Italian seemed to show little appetite for it, insisting the captaincy was a matter for the coach.

The issues were different this time. But Bernstein resolved to take the matter out of Capello’s hands reasoning, say insiders, that the issue was not simply a football matter but a broader one.

Bernstein’s statement, delivered direct to camera in Pravda-esque fashion from a Wembley box, made this explicit: “Fabio Capello has not been involved in the FA board discussions which reached this conclusion, but understands that the FA board has authority to make this decision.”

Bernstein’s move to bring the Club England wing of the organisation back under the jurisdiction of the FA chairman is also significant, allowing for swifter decision-making.

It has hard to imagine the famously low-key Geoff Thompson, Bernstein’s predecessor but one, putting his head above the parapet in such a way. And such was the level of vicious infighting during the David Triesman era, it is equally difficult to see him building a consensus for swift action in the way that Bernstein did.

Bernstein is quiet too. But quietly effective. Once Terry’s case was adjourned to July he consulted his 13 fellow board members, a number swelled since the addition of non-executive directors Heather Rabbatts and Roger Devlin last month, by phone on Thursday. The majority shared his view and Bernstein called the Chelsea player himself on Friday morning to inform him of the decision.

Rather than worrying about precedent or previous cases, he judged the situation on the facts before him and shifted course when circumstances changed. There is a valid debate about whether the FA should have acted earlier, especially once Terry was charged in December, but Bernstein can point to the widespread belief that the case was to be settled before the European Championship.

There is talk of a more businesslike approach in the Wembley boardroom since Bernstein arrived in January last year. Premier League insiders make increasingly positive noises about relations with their counterparts at Wembley, while good relations with Uefa have been fostered.

The former Manchester City and Wembley chairman has been criticised for his lack of dynamism in public. But following a period during which the FA churned through six chief executives and three chairmen in a decade, who all jumped or pushed for a variety of reasons, his calmly resolute stance might be just what it needs. He will need every ounce of it for battles to come. The FA is going into a major tournament with a coach who will leave at its end, no discernible succession plan in place and a now former captain facing a racism charge weeks after it concludes. Meanwhile, football’s response to government calls for change in the way the game is governed is due by the end of the month, with the composition of the FA board a sticking point. And for any stability to endure, the FA’s statutes will have to be changed if the 68-year-old Bernstein is to carry on beyond his 70th birthday in May 2013.

There will be no immediate respite either. Already, many are questioning whether it is a sustainable position to strip Terry of the captaincy but not suspend him altogether. Atop the dysfunctional FA, balancing inertia and knee-jerk reaction while being buffeted by the demands of the media and avoiding being undone from within by politicking or from without by the demands of the professional game has often seemed an impossible job. Bernstein seems to have got the balance about right. For now, at least.

John TerryThe FAEnglandChelseaFootball politicsOwen Gibson
guardian.co.uk

Sergio Agüero sparks scramble by asking to leave Atlético Madrid

• Argentina forward says ‘the time has come’ to leave Atlético
• Real Madrid favourites to sign their local rivals’ star player

Sergio Agüero has publicly stated his desire to leave Atlético Madrid this summer, posting messages on his website and on Twitter saying he felt he needed a move to continue his development.

“I said long ago that when I wanted to go, I would say so publicly. And the time has come,” the statement said. “So I keep to my word and here I am. I find it hard to leave Atlético. It hurts and saddens me.

“I’ve thought long and hard and I am convinced that I must be true to myself. I do not think I put a ceiling on the ability to keep learning, to keep growing. After five intense years, this stage for me personally is over and I have to give way to a new one.

“I’m about to turn 23 and I have everything before me. Suffice it to say that this is not an economic issue but strictly a sporting one. So I want to clearly express my appreciation to the club for the efforts they have made for giving me a salary that equates with the largest clubs in the world.”

Agüero, 22, has scored over 100 goals for Atlético since joining from Independiente as a teenager in 2006. As recently as January he signed a new contract that runs until 2014 and was also named the club’s vice-captain.

However, Agüero said he signed the new deal with an understanding that he may leave this summer, merely wanting to ensure Atlético received a larger fee.

“I want to say also that this decision has been maturing for some time,” he added. “The issue was discussed and agreed with Atlético last year when I was renewing my contract.

“I wanted to sign as a way to give back to the club for all the support they have given me. Had I not done so, they might not have received any more for my transfer. I received then a promise that the club would not stand in my way if I wanted to leave this summer. Therefore, in line with that commitment and my decision, I have asked them to listen to any offers they receive for me from different clubs.”

Atlético suffered a disappointing season as they finished seventh in La Liga, although that has been good enough to earn them a place in the Europa League.

Nevertheless speculation over Agüero’s future has been rife lately. Juventus, Liverpool and Manchester City have all been linked with the son-in-law of Diego Maradona and Real Madrid and Chelsea had offers rejected in January. Only last week the Atlético chief executive, Miguel Angel Gil Marín, said Agüero was not for sale.

Atlético MadridReal MadridChelseaLiverpoolManchester CityTransfer windowguardian.co.uk

Carlo Ancelotti uncertain over his Chelsea future after United defeat

• ‘It’s not my decision whether I stay here or not’
• Italian says Torres’s selection may have been a mistake

Carlo Ancelotti has cast doubt on his long-term future as Chelsea manager and admitted the decision as to whether he remains at the club beyond the summer will be determined purely by the owner, Roman Abramovich.

The Italian, who had admitted he was “not afraid” of the consequences of elimination before the Champions League quarter-final defeat at Manchester United, has another 14 months to run on his contract .

“I’m not concerned,” he said. “I have to work. I have to try to do my best. It’s not my decision whether I stay here or not. I haven’t spoken with [Roman].”

Ancelotti did concede that he might have made a mistake by selecting Fernando Torres, the club’s £50m British record signing, for the second leg. The Spaniard, who has gone 693 minutes without a goal for Chelsea, was utterly ineffective and was withdrawn at half-time.

Asked whether the 27-year-old’s inclusion had been a mistake, the manager said: “Maybe. Could be. But I thought for a lot of time before taking this decision. I preferred to start with Fernando for this kind of game, with this kind of tactics. But Didier played very well in the second half.”

Carlo AncelottiChelseaRoman AbramovichChampions LeagueDominic Fifieldguardian.co.uk