Nicolas Anelka’s move from Chelsea to China is no Shanghai surprise | David Hytner

The French striker’s Jedi cool has always meant that he will not be forced down anything other than his own chosen path

The hooded figure walked calmly through the frenzy, headphones in, dark glasses on, like some sort of Jedi. Nicolas Anelka had landed back in Europe, at Heathrow, after his World Cup tantrum in South Africa had sparked mutiny and meltdown in the France camp. He was click‑clicked every step of his way to the getaway car.

He did not need the shades. Anelka’s public face has always resembled a mask; the eyes staring impassively into the distance, whether in triumph or disaster. When the striker became a Champions League winner in 2000 with Real Madrid – he started in the 3-0 victory over Valencia in Paris – he seemed cut off, somewhat isolated, in the post-match celebrations.

Spool forward to the 2008 final in Moscow and when his shootout miss for Chelsea saw Manchester United crowned as the champions, unleashing extremes of emotion in all quarters, there was barely a flicker from him. Anelka’s nonchalance borders on the fatalistic; his professionalism is so icy that he regularly invites the accusation that he does not give a fig.

His transfer from Chelsea to Shanghai Shenhua, from the “greatest league in the world” to the fringes of the world game, at the age of 32, feels like his latest cold-blooded career decision. He might have been lining up at Stamford Bridge against Manchester City, one of his many former clubs, in one of the English season’s showpiece games. Instead, he is preparing to leap into the unknown in January. It ought to be mildly shocking yet Anelka has lost the capacity to shock.

He merely polarises opinion like few others. He is a hero to the kids in the banlieues, an icon with the power to roll up one of his tracksuit legs to the knee and spark a fashion craze. There are few players cooler than Anelka. But to many others in France he is seen as a mercenary who will be forever tainted by his rant at the national team’s manager, Raymond Domenech, at half-time in a 2010 World Cup group fixture against Mexico.

“Go and fuck yourself and your tactics,” Anelka told Domenech. After refusing to apologise, he was put on a flight to London, the end of his World Cup coming shortly before that of his country. His international career was effectively over when he was given an 18-game suspension. “I’m dying of laughter,” he said.

When Domenech’s players went on strike over Anelka’s expulsion, it showed his popularity in dressing rooms. Apart from at Madrid, when established stars made sure he was never welcomed, he has been well liked. At Chelsea, there was tremendous admiration for him and no little disillusionment when he was marginalised and then banished by André Villas-Boas.

Authority can fire Anelka’s non-conformist streak. If he has always tended to put himself first, he does not take kindly to being treated with disrespect. A hasty exit was likely when Villas-Boas told him he could not use the first-team facilities, after he had requested a transfer. It took him less than a week to finalise his two-year contract at Shenhua, which is worth €10.6m (£8.9m) a year.

Some misconceptions have built around Anelka. He was not a disadvantaged Parisian urbanite – he was born in Versailles and his parents had regular jobs. He is a committed family man, a father of two boys who enjoys nothing more than quiet time. He believes that Shanghai will be a great city for the children.

But he has allowed the enigmatic image to grow, spiced by his apparent wanderlust, the transfer fees that total £85.8m and the influence of his brothers Claude and Didier, who advise him – some would say badly. Anelka would argue that his move from Arsenal to Madrid came too early; that he wanted to stay at Liverpool; and that the transfers to City, Fenerbahce and Bolton were part of the quest to return to a leading club.

Anelka attended the Clairefontaine centre of excellence with Thierry Henry and was thought the better prospect. He was the prototype modern No9: jet-heeled, super fit and efficient, with silky smooth technique. But if he can look like the best player on any pitch, he has also shown infuriating inconsistency and, at times, indifference. The debate rages as to whether he has fulfilled his potential.

In 1997, at the Under-20 World Cup, Anelka missed a penalty in a quarter-final shootout lost to Uruguay. The France manager, Gérard Houllier, spoke of him lacking mental strength but being honest enough to recognise it. Plenty of people have got between the hip-hop beat in Anelka’s ears and found complexity. The game has been richer for it.

FranceWorld Cup 2010ChelseaDavid Hytnerguardian.co.uk

André Villas-Boas says Chelsea ‘have given critics a slap in the face’

• Chelsea advance to knockout stage of Champions League
• Villas-Boas says his players ‘deserve respect they don’t get’

André Villas-Boas was scathing of critics for their “persecution of Chelsea” and hailed his players for giving “everyone a slap in the face” as they confirmed their passage to the Champions League knockout stage as Group E winners.

“It was a win of human values, responsibility, solidarity, strength of character, team spirit, ability to take criticism, resilience, and it was a great win for Chelsea players,” the manager said. “They deserve a respect they don’t get. We’ve been continually chased by different kinds of people but today we’ve given everyone – those critics – a slap in the face.”

Asked if he and his players felt anger, Villas-Boas said: “No, I just think the reaction has been over the top. There’s only one team in the country at the moment, and that’s Manchester City. I hope they qualify sincerely [for the Champions League]. But the attitude has been if they qualify they qualify, and if they don’t they don’t. That’s not the same as with us.”

Villas-Boas appeared to single out Gary Neville, the former Manchester United captain who is a pundit for Sky Sports, for a perceived slight. “We see a Manchester United defender who says he doesn’t want to play as a Chelsea player and play in a game like this. This has been a continuous persecution of Chelsea, continuous aggression of one club. We have become your target. We have to accept it.”

Regarding the 3-0 win over Valencia, Villas-Boas admitted he had adjusted the team’s strategy to a more compact approach. “We made changes to the way we played,” he said. “Today it was evident. We tried it at Newcastle the other day. We kept our block further down the pitch, a medium low compact block with not a lot of space between the lines. We gave Valencia a lot of possession.”

Villas-Boas has maintained that the philosophy of the club under him would be the last element of his tenure to die. So had he changed this ethos against Valencia? “Yes. There is a phrase that is interesting: ‘The person that you are is a triumph in the person you want to be.’ This was a triumph in human values. A different strategy, but the same philosophy in human values.”

Frank Lampard was dropped to the bench and Villas-Boas confirmed he was no longer an automatic choice. “He has been fantastic in the way he’s taken these tough decisions, but he will continue to threaten for the starting XI.”

André Villas-BoasChelseaChampions League 2011-12Champions LeagueJamie Jacksonguardian.co.uk

Arsenal provide hard evidence in case for Champions League defence | Kevin McCarra

Arsène Wenger’s team have a solidity at the back that United, City and Chelsea must wish they could summon themselves

As if it were not enough for Arsenal to beat Borussia Dortmund on Wednesday night and thus to win their Champions League group, they also received rare compliments for their fortitude. Arsène Wenger relished them. The value of defensive strength was underlined in a week when the other entrants from the Premier League floundered. Manchester United could not hold on to a 2-1 lead and drew with Benfica at home. Manchester City lost in Naples and Chelsea fell to a stoppage-time goal in Leverkusen.

The tournament, with such results to its credit, emerges triumphant. This is how the contest for a great prize ought to be conducted. There should be a mercurial quality to a competition that embraces a continent. The faltering of three English clubs in the Champions League could also assist in reviving fascination with the tournament in this