Former Chelsea reserve Jeffrey Ntuka ’stabbed to death in a nightclub’

• Ntuka died after reported brawl in Free State, South Africa
• South Africa defender, 26, was on Chelsea’s books in 2003

The former South Africa defender Jeffrey Ntuka, who was on the books at Chelsea until 2009, has been stabbed to death in a nightclub in the township of Kroonstad in Free State province. The 26-year-old died in the early hours of Saturday morning following a reported brawl, according to police.

Ntuka spent six months at Chelsea playing for the reserves in 2003 before being loaned to the Belgian club Westerlo for five years.

He then returned to Stamford Bridge for two months before returning home to South Africa to play for Kaizer Chiefs, and most recently Supersport United. He had five international caps.

The player’s agent, Michael Hughes, said: “I just spoke to his wife for a couple of minutes and she confirmed that Ntuka has passed away after being stabbed. Unfortunately, trouble seemed to follow Jeffrey around.

“He tried hard to surround himself with the right people and club-mates. But he struggled to really shake the image and stories that dogged his career.”

Chelsea
guardian.co.uk

Chelsea take first step towards leaving Stamford Bridge for new home

• Club seek to buy back freehold on current home
• Chairman Bruce Buck seeks to reassure fans

Chelsea are to take what will be perceived as the first significant step towards leaving Stamford Bridge for a new 60,000-seat stadium, by seeking to buy back the freehold for the land on which their home of 106 years is built.

Shareholders at Chelsea Pitch Owners plc, a company founded in 1993 to safeguard the then financially vulnerable London club’s future at Stamford Bridge, will receive on Tuesday details of an offer to repurchase the pitch, the turnstiles and the freehold for the land on which the stadium’s four stands are built. The company bought the assets for £10m in 1997, with the aid of an £8.5m loan secured from Chelsea’s then holding company. The club are now offering effectively to write off that debt and buy back the freehold for an identical £1.5m.

While Chelsea are at pains to insist that no dialogue is underway with developers over potential new sites, there have been tentative discussions in the recent past over the availability and viability of sites at Battersea Nine Elms, Earl’s Court and Olympia, White City and Imperial Wharf to house a ground that can better Arsenal’s Emirates Stadium in terms of capacity and match-day revenue.

Chelsea are aware of the difficulties in increasing the 41,800 capacity of Stamford Bridge, and they would be better positioned to react to a suitable area becoming available once they have secured the land on which their home since 1905 stands. They would need to sell the stadium for redevelopment, in order to part-fund the purchase of land for any new ground and the construction costs.

Chelsea expect fierce opposition within CPO, a company that was formed to ensure Stamford Bridge never fell into the hands of property developers – the ground had been sold to Marler Estates plc (later Cabra Estates plc) in 1984, only for that company to go into liquidation eight years later – and which may oppose the possibility of the club leaving their only home. The Chelsea chairman, Bruce Buck, is hopeful the potential long-term benefits can secure an agreement.

“Some shareholders will not react positively, and there will be a group of fans who consider this to be a precursor to Chelsea moving, and they will not want Chelsea to move,” Buck said. “At the moment we have no discussions on-going with any developer, and we still have not made the decision that, yes, Chelsea definitely want to move. But, just like any business, we have at least to be prepared for a move if something right comes along.

“This [buying the freehold] is something we should have done five years ago when we were clearing up the financial housekeeping of Chelsea, like the Eurobonds issue and other kinds of financing that we had on the books that really weren’t appropriate for a club now wholly owned by Roman Abramovich.” Asked whether buying the freehold represented the only way Chelsea could move to a new home, Buck said: “That’s the bottom line. We could not move unless the club had the ability to redevelop this site. That would be a precondition to getting the money to help us move.”

Notification of an extraordinary general meeting, to be held on 27 October, has been issued to the 12,000 CPO shareholders. The club will need to secure the support of 50% of those in attendance if their offer is to be accepted. There remains, therefore, potential for the plans to be blocked at an early stage. The fact that shareholders are seeing no return for their investment – the shares cost £100 each in 1997 – could prompt further opposition.

Chelsea have indicated that 10% of seats in any new stadium would be available to families and supporters under 21, and that no relocation would take place before 2020, unless within a three-mile radius of Stamford Bridge.

“There are only ‘x’ number of sites in London that we would consider and, by 2020, we expect those sites to be gone,” Buck said. “So we would have no restrictions after 2020 in terms of where we could move. But we are confident that most of these shareholders are fans of Chelsea and will understand and approve what we’re trying to do.”

ChelseaDominic Fifieldguardian.co.uk

Fulham show leaders of Premier League pack are no longer unassailable | Kevin McCarra

Unfancied clubs are sensing some of the elite are now vulnerable, a feeling backed up by early results

The 21st of August is a little early for anyone to be demanding homage. Florent Malouda, all the same, was quizzical rather than arrogant on Saturday when complaining that there are no hymns of praise for Chelsea even when they have opened the defence of the title by scoring half-a-dozen goals without reply in each of the two fixtures to date.

The winger’s bafflement may well be genuine. You can understand Malouda’s frustration over the hosannas reserved for Arsenal, a club without a trophy since 2005, let alone the Double achieved by Chelsea last season. The Stamford Bridge club even set a Premier League record with their 103 goals. Nonetheless, Chelsea would probably be bewildered if they ever became the nation’s darlings.

There is no imminent danger on that front. Should fans of the opposition ever fall silent it is because they cannot decide who to boo first. It does not take much effort to come up with seemingly high-minded objections to Chelsea despite the fact that the proprietor, Roman Abramovich, with the days of transfer market excess behind him, now looks as if the greatest ambition he harbours is to balance the books one day.

Manchester City have the sort of financial backing that makes the present Stamford Bridge operation look like a humble workers’ co-operative, but results will have to improve before they can savour the satisfaction of knowing they are feared and loathed. Dread, indeed, is scarce throughout the Premier League. If other clubs sense that the elite are now vulnerable then the early results tend to vindicate them.

Chelsea alone have emerged from their first two games with full points. At this juncture a year ago, Arsenal, Tottenham and Manchester City had kept pace with them. Carlo Ancelotti’s team would go on to rack up half-a-dozen consecutive victories. City and Tottenham, for that matter, each started with four wins in a row. The environment this year is more challenging. Arsenal are perhaps the one English club in the Champions League that is expected to get better and the scope for progress was great in any case.

It feels as if there is a convergence of standards in the Premier League. Fulham’s 2-2 draw with Manchester United on Sunday was, statistically speaking, a backward step since Sir Alex Ferguson’s players had been beaten on their previous two trips to Craven Cottage. That, all the same, was not how it looked.

United did take the lead and would have held a late and unassailable 3-1 advantage if Nani’s penalty had not been saved by David Stockdale, but Ferguson had the honesty to state that a draw was the least Fulham deserved. He will be better equipped when Wayne Rooney, who was suffering from ailing form in the goalmouth before illness kept him out of the match, is his true self again.

Fulham had no fear and there was conviction in the way Mark Hughes’s men launched themselves at United after the interval. It would be crass to claim that the conservatism departed Craven Cottage when Roy Hodgson left to become Liverpool manager. If there is more self-belief in the ranks it must originate in the sort of nights he presided over, such as the pounding of Juventus, on the path to the Europa League final.

The striker Bobby Zamora is one of the men who seems galvanised by that experience. For his part, Brede Hangeland, scorer of an own goal and Fulham’s equaliser on Sunday, envisages an eventful life for a club with reason to be forceful nowadays. “In the past against United and other good teams,” the defender said, “even at home we’ve conceded ground and let them play. Now we try and press higher and take the game to them.”

There is a degree of levelling down in the Premier League that should encourage boldness. While some clubs, such as Arsenal, have squads that ought be on the rise, there are few that look intimidating. Even Chelsea have to negotiate a long programme with key contributors, such as Frank Lampard and Didier Drogba, who are not all that far from being termed veterans.

By their own expectations, the English representatives had a quiet time of it in the last Champions League campaign, whose final was contested by Internazionale and Bayern Munich. The foremost clubs in this country are very far from disintegration, but there is no cause to consider them unassailable. If the Premier League cannot claim to be the pre-eminent domestic competition in the world any longer, it will serve the public handsomely if it fills our weekends with suspense and unpredictability.

ChelseaArsenalKevin McCarraguardian.co.uk